Advice on Debt and Law
The Scottish Law Commission has issued its Report on Diligence.
(Diligence is the name given to debt enforcement in Scotland.) The
Commission?s task is to review legislation and make recommendations
for improvement to the Scottish Parliament.
Its recommendations are far reaching. While
they are only recommendations, the Commission exercises strong
influence and I would hope the majority of its conclusions will
be incorporated into a Bill within the next year. There will
almost certainly be a hostile reaction, however, from some
members of the Scottish Parliament.
All creditors ? secured and unsecured ?
should gear up in advance.
New Methods of Enforcement
Three completely new forms of debt enforcement are recommended,
namely:
- Land Attachments
- Ordinary Attachments and
- Money Attachments.
In addition, reforms are proposed for
Inhibitions (to make them more user friendly) and to various
parts of Insolvency law.
The existing enforcement measure of
Adjudication ("er, what?" I hear you say) is to be
repealed, if the recommendation is followed. Having seen this
used once in the last 10 years, I doubt this will be a major
hardship. Similarly, the abolition of the Diligence Act 1661 will
not be keeping me awake at night.
The possible effect on both unsecured and
secured lenders is examined towards the end of this
article.
Land Attachments
The only way of explaining a proposed new form of enforcement
without you losing the will to live is in a step by step guide,
so here goes:
- Following expiry of a Charge (ie after
Decree ? judgment, a court order for payment - and a further
document), an unpaid creditor can register a Notice of Land
Attachment in the property registers
- After 14 days of the notice, this will
give the creditor a subordinate right, over the property, for
payment of the debt
- For those first 14 days, the notice will
have the same effect as an Inhibition restricted to the land in
question (ie it may still stop sale by the debtor)
- After 6 months, the creditor would apply
to the Court for authority to sell the land to pay or reduce the
debt.
- This can be done against a debtor?s
principal house.
- There is no limit, high or low, on the
size of debt which can give rise to a Notice of Land Attachment;
but
- Authority to sell the land will only be
granted by the Court if the debt is £1,500 or more at the
time of the application to sell.
- To justify the granting of authority to
sell, the debt must be reduced by the lower of £500 or 10%
of the debt.
- When the application to sell is made, the
Court will grant an order requiring any prior security holder to
disclose the amount outstanding and an order appointing a
surveyor to report on the open market value of the
land.
- Authority to sell can be granted even
where the property is jointly owned with another party although
the Court may take this into account in deciding whether to grant
authority.
- Once authority to sell is granted, a
"suitably independent solicitor" (SIS) is appointed by
the Court to market and sell the attached land.
- On sale, the proceeds are applied as
follows:
- The creditor?s sale expenses
- The sums due to prior security holders (so
far as possible from sale proceeds)
- The amount due to the attaching creditor;
and
- The sums due to creditors postponed to the
attaching creditor
Attachments
>Still with me? Then, in the immortal words of Magnus
Magnusson (a man with imaginative parents), I?ve started so I?ll
finish.
The Commission also recommends the ability,
by service of an attachment order, to attach all property which
is capable of being transferred. This includes moveable
property.
Once again, here is a step by step guide to
what is proposed:
- The creditor would apply to the Court for
an attachment order
- After notification to the debtor, he
should apply to the court for a satisfaction order in relation to
the attached property
- The Court can issue interim orders that
stop the debtor and specified third parties entering into deals
over the property sought to be attached.
- the attachment order would give the
creditor a right over the attached property in security of
payment of the debt, interest and expenses.
- The satisfaction order referred to can be
for sale of the property and payment of the net proceeds to the
creditor; for an income transfer order diverting future payments
to the debtor (under an annuity for example) to the creditor; and
for an order authorising the creditor to lease or license the
property.
- The proceeds have to be applied in the
following order:
- to the expenses of the
procedure;
- to interest on the sum due;
and
- to any other sum due (including the debt
itself)
Money Attachments
You?re doing well. This is the juicy bit.
For too long, it has not been possible to
freeze money in the hands of the debtor where the debtor is wise
to the possibility and deliberately keeps an account in overdraft
(so avoiding arrestments).
Now, this new proposed form of enforcement
would allow cash, cheques and various other documents in the
hands of the debtor to be attached. Sheriff Officers executing
such orders are entitled to assume that money in the possession
of the debtor is owned by the debtor but sadly they are not
permitted to search debtors or their handbags, wallets or
"similar personal receptacles" ? can you imagine the
litigation over that phrase? I can hardly wait.
The procedure for Money Attachments should
be generally similar to ordinary Attachments but rather than
applying for a satisfaction order, the creditor simply seeks an
order for payment of the money attached. The order of payment is
the same as stated for Attachments.
Effect on Unsecured Lenders
These proposed changes will be welcome news to unsecured lenders
who have been faced with a mass of debtor friendly measures
pushed forward by the Scottish Parliament.
In particular, there will be relief that
some form of alternative diligence is proposed to deal with the
abolition of poindings and warrant sales and the general
difficulty there can be in pursuing self-employed
debtors.
Effect on Secured Lenders
Although as you would expect, there is provision for repayment of
prior securities on sale by land attachment, the proposals take
some further degree of control away from prior security holders.
In addition, those working to tight margins and at the higher end
of loan to value ratios will be disturbed by the suggestion that
the attaching creditor?s expenses are to be dedicated first
before they see the net sale proceeds.
One consequence may be less tolerance of
erratic debtors before proceedings are raised for
repossession.
Summary
Watch this space for future developments. In the meantime, for
further details just ask. For a copy of the full report,
see
www.scotlawcom.gov.uk.
Written by Mark Higgins
Member of the
Diligence Committee of the Law Society of Scotland
|